Cleveland News

Northeast Ohio News

Business & Technology News

Weather & Cams

Suburban Links
Cleveland Sports·  
· Barons
· Browns
· Cavaliers 
· Force
· Indians
· Vikings

High School Links

Entertainment &
the Arts



Science & Space

Cleveland History

Cleveland Press History

Traffic

Lottery & Gaming


NEO classifieds
· Jobs
Advertising info

Shopping guide


About us

Free Cleveland Press Toolbar



 

Peter Simunovich

Australian Election

So what do you know about Australia? Kangaroos. Vegemite. Koala bears. Elle Macpherson. Crocodile Dundee. Foster's beer or Nicole Kidman? The land from Down Under has always been a very close ally of the United States during a crisis.


Well, while most of us slept on the night on Friday, October 8, after digesting the riveting second presidential debate between the incumbent George W. Bush and John Kerry, Australia went to the polls to elect a new government.


While the election there hardly raised a ripple in the media here as the electorate is polarized by the war in Iraq, terrorism and the economy. The election was closely watched by the Bush Administration because it could be a good indication how he will perform against Kerry on November 2. The link is Iraq.
Australian Prime Minister John Howard, who leads the Liberal Party, acknowledged as the conservatives, has fully backed President Bush in Iraq and also sent troops there to topple Saddam Hussein.  And the White House eagerly wanted to know whether the Howard-led conservatives would be reelected. Before the election President Bush sent Howard a message wishing him the best before the country voted.


Howard's party was reelected and delivered a stunning loss to the center left Labor Party led by Mark Latham. Bush, locked in a horse race with Kerry, must be buoyed by the result with the US election less than a month away. The White House's interest in the Australian election was highlighted that a long time and loyal ally had not flinched over Iraq. The Australian government backed Bush in Iraq by sending combat troops at the start of the war and endorsed his views that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. But as this theory weakened over the past few months, Howard still stood firmly behind the US while Latham, his opponent, was a staunch critic of the conflict in Iraq.


In Australia, according to reports, analysts warned that the election may not have been decided by the events in Iraq, but by the rapidly improving economy.  Nonetheless, the White House will see this as a positive result for Bush. The US economy is also improving, albeit not as robust as the administration would like, but the President has repeatedly said it will get stronger after coming out of a recession, the corporate scandals and the 9/11 terrorist attacks. Australia, according to reports, now has less than 200 troops in Iraq, primarily as security for its Embassy.
For the politically minded, Australians do not vote for their Prime Minister. Instead they vote for their preferred party and the one with the most seats in the House of Representatives forms a government. The party's cabinet members then vote for the Prime Minister. It is safe to assume that Howard, who also had to win his seat in Sydney, will not be challenged when his cabinet meets to elect a new leader. For Bush the Australian election result was a timely result.


Looking for something specific?

Search below to find it on Cleveland Press.com 

Google
  Web www.clevelandpress.com